EU court rejects US airline challenge to emissions charges

The European Court of Justice threw out Wednesday a case brought by north American airlines against a new EU system charging airlines for carbon emissions. European Union law \"including aviation activities in the EU\'s emissions trading scheme is valid,\" said judges in a ruling which tees up US reprisals threatened by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The EU is to include from January 1 all airlines in its Emissions Trading System (ETS), used to charge industries such as oil refineries, power stations and steel works for CO2 emissions as part of Europe\'s efforts against climate change. Furious US, Canadian and other carriers say their inclusion violates international aviation pacts. Under the scheme, airlines would have to pay for 15 percent of the polluting rights accorded to them, the figure rising to 18 percent in 2013-2020. \"Application of the emissions trading scheme to aviation infringes neither the principles of customary international law at issue nor the Open Skies Agreement\" across the Atlantic, the court decided. \"It is only if the operators of such aircraft choose to operate a commercial air route arriving at or departing from an airport situated in the EU that they are subject to the emissions trading scheme,\" it added. As a result of this choice, the EU system \"infringes neither the principle of territoriality nor the sovereignty of third states, since the scheme is applicable to the operators only when their aircraft are physically in the territory of one of the member states of the EU.\"