The government has failed to get permission to appeal to the Supreme Court over its plan to cut subsidies for solar panels on homes. The UK\'s highest court said it could not challenge a High Court ruling that blocked the halving of payments to households generating solar energy. Critics argued the plan to bring the lower rate in in December was too short notice and lacked proper consultation. The lower tariff will now apply to panels installed after 1 April. Campaigners argued that the plans had caused huge uncertainty in the industry, which employs tens of thousands of people. Friends of the Earth\'s executive director Andy Atkins described the ruling as \"a landmark decision which will prevent ministers causing industry chaos with similar subsidy cuts in future\". The government said the court\'s decision drew a line under the case. \"We will now focus all our efforts on ensuring the future stability and cost effectiveness of solar and other microgeneration technologies for the many, not the few,\" said Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Davey. \'Unlawful\' Under the feed-in tariffs programme, people in the UK with solar panels are paid for the electricity they generate. The new tariff of 21p per kilowatt hour, down from the current 43.3p/kwh, had been expected to come into effect for panels finished after 1 April, but in October the government said it would be paid to anyone who installed their solar panels after 12 December 2011. The government announced a consultation on the proposals which closed on 23 December. The High Court ruled that changing the tariffs before the end of an official consultation period was \"legally flawed\". Upholding that ruling, the Supreme Court said the government\'s appeal \"does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time\". The court\'s decision now means that all domestic installations finished before 3 March this year will still get the higher 43.3p rate. Installations finished between 3 March and 31 March temporarily get the old higher rate until 1 April then it is reduced to 21p. The legal challenge was initiated by Friends of the Earth and two solar firms, Solarcentury and HomeSun. Caroline Flint MP, Labour\'s shadow energy and climate change secretary, said: \"Today\'s ruling proves, once and for all, that the government\'s cuts to solar power are not just bad for the public, bad for jobs and growth, and bad for the environment, but unlawful.\"
GMT 09:26 2018 Tuesday ,23 January
France says it fell short on greenhouse gas emissionsGMT 08:25 2018 Saturday ,20 January
Greenpeace activists face fine over Eiffel Tower protestGMT 04:38 2018 Saturday ,20 January
US to overtake Saudi as crude oil producer: IEAGMT 10:43 2018 Friday ,19 January
TransCanada secures contracts to move forward with Keystone constructionGMT 08:54 2018 Thursday ,18 January
Norway aims for all short-haul flights 100% electric by 2040GMT 15:12 2018 Wednesday ,17 January
BP hit by new $1.7bn Gulf oil spill chargeGMT 16:31 2018 Monday ,15 January
Two schools could win Dh1m of solar panels in Sustainability Champions competitionGMT 03:08 2018 Monday ,15 January
Danish wind power whips up record 43% of electricityMaintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Send your comments
Your comment as a visitor